0 (at release) as well as VMware including ESXi.. rar Siemens.. .. how to crack big fish trial gamessimatic step 7 downloadWinCC Version 6 SP4 is the latest version of SCADA software from Siemens, ... Dec 20, 2020 Free Download Siemens Simatic Manager Step 7 and ... Simatic WinCC Flexible v SP3 x86x64 Siemens Simatic WinCC Web Navigator v6.
siemens step 5 crack
radan 7 crack, Feb 24, 2017 Hello, I'm looking for some advice on the best approach ... 4.0 crack, rhinonest crack, rhinonest plugin free download, rhinonest for rhino 6 download,憎.. ... Macos raid 5 .. HD Online Player (Forza Horizon 2 Pc Download Utorrent) b23e98e901
(b) applying a probabilistic analysis (34) to the crack flaw data and expected crack propagation rate to generate a statistical distribution (36) of the propagation of the crack flaw during a predetermined operating time period of the rotor (10);
(c) using the statistical distribution of the propagated crack flaw, data regarding the geometry of the dovetail connector (16) and operating conditions of the rotor (10) to perform Finite Element analysis to determine a load applied to a hook (18) of the dovetail connector (16) during the predetermined operating time period of the rotor (10);
(d) determining (46) whether the rotor (10), at the end of the predetermined operating time period, has reached a crack failure criteria based on the statistical distribution of the propagated crack flaw and determined hook load; and
The subject-matter of claim 1 contravened Article 123(2) EPC. Step (e) of original claim 8 defined that the crack propagation rate was determined based on the crack flaw data. Its omission contravened Article 123(2) EPC.
The subject-matter of claim 1 fulfilled the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC. Feature (e) of original claim 8 defined determining propagation of a crack and not a rate of propagation. There was nothing in the original description specifying that the expected propagation rate was determined from the crack flaw data, such that there was no need to include such a feature in the claim. The crack propagation, as referred to in step (e) of original claim 8, obviously was determined from the crack flaw data by applying the previously determined expected propagation rate da/dt to the crack flaw data.
1.2 Step (e) of original claim 8, on which claim 1 as found allowable by the opposition division is based, defined "determining crack propagation (38) based on the crack flaw data and a period of elapsed operating time of the component, and applying adjusting the crack data to include the determined crack propagation."
1.3 As already stated in the communication of the Board (see item 1.1), the now deleted step (e) of original claim 8 related to adjusting the actual crack data in the analysis. In step (a) of original claim 8, crack flaw data regarding current crack flaws was obtained. In original step (b), this data of the current crack flaws underwent a probabilistic analysis to generate statistical distributions of crack data and the propagation rate, which were then (in step (c)) used to determine loads on a turbine component. In step (d), based on the crack flaw data and the determined loads, it was determined whether the turbine component had reached a crack failure criteria. This failure criteria determination was hence first performed based on a statistical distribution of crack data representing unpropagated cracks. Only in the last, now deleted, step (e) was the new crack propagation determined after a period of elapsed operating time and the crack data adjusted accordingly.
1.4 New feature (e) defines repeating new steps (b) to (d). Step (b) starts with the determination of the statistical distribution of the propagation of the crack flaw during a predetermined operating time. The following steps (c) and (d) - in which it is determined whether a failure criteria has been reached - are hence performed based on a statistical distribution of crack data representing the already propagated cracks.
1.5 Thus the repetition of steps (b) to (d) does not define the same concept as disclosed in original claim 8 but rather a (general) concept, in which the determination whether a failure criteria has been reached is already initially performed on the data of the propagated crack.
The characterization of as-sintered samples was carried out by scanning electron microscopy (SEM/EDX, JEOL JMS-840) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) using CuKα radiation (Siemens D-5000 diffractometer). Data were collected from 25 to 63 2θ with step of 0.02 and counting time 12 s. The identification of phases present was done using JCPDS files n 9-432 to HA phase, 17-923 to ZrO2 tetragonal phase and 13-307 to ZrO2 monoclinic phase.
The cyclic plastic deformation of polycrystals leads to the inhomogeneous distribution of the cyclic plastic strain. The cyclic plastic strain is concentrated in thin bands, called persistent slip bands (PSBs). The dislocation structure of these bands generally differs from the matrix structure and is characterized by alternating dislocation-rich and dislocation-poor regions. The mechanisms of the dislocation motion in the PSBs and the formation of the point defects and their migration are quantitatively described. It is shown that, due to localized cyclic plastic straining in the PSBs, persistent slip markings (PSMs) are produced where the PSBs emerge on the surface. They typically consist of a central extrusion accompanied by one or two parallel intrusions. The deep intrusion is equivalent to the crack-like surface defect. The concentration of the cyclic strain in the tip of an intrusion leads to intragranular fatigue crack initiation. The mechanism of the early crack growth in the primary slip plane is proposed and discussed. Numerous PSMs are produced on the surface of the cyclically loaded materials. PSMs contribute to the formation of the surface relief, as well as the relief on the grain boundary. PSMs from one grain impinging the grain boundary are sufficient to create sharp relief on the grain boundary. Void-like defects weaken the grain boundary cohesion and extra material push both grains locally apart. The conditions necessary for the weakening of the grain boundary are enumerated and examples of grain boundary crack initiations are shown. The relevant parameters affecting grain boundary initiation are identified and discussed. The collected experimental evidence and analysis is mostly based on the papers published by the author and his colleagues in the Institute of Physics of Materials in Brno. 2ff7e9595c
Comments